The Woman in Black is one of
my favourite ghost stories and one I know quite well having read the book and
watched the play long before the film was announced.
The film adaptation was my kind of horror as it was filled with well earned jump scares,
tension and very little gore. The sequel was inevitable and I can’t pretend
that I was unhappy at the announcement.
PLOT: Set during WW2, school teacher Eve Parkins (Phoebe
Fox) accompanies a group of evacuees to Eel Marsh House where fresh sightings of
the Woman in Black endanger the lives of the children.
END PLOT
The plot of The Woman in
Black: Angel of Death is basic but with horror films sometimes simplicity can
be made up for in other ways. Unfortunately
this was not to be the case. The Woman
in Black managed to create decent amounts of tension to build up some very
affective jump scares however the jump scares in the sequel weren’t earned and
felt cheap. I couldn’t understand why
the rating was a 15 rather than the 12A of the previous film but I realised
quite quickly this was due to who died rather than how they died.
Phoebe Fox and Jeremy
Irvine were fine in their respective roles but their characters were so
bland there was very little they could do to with their performances to
lift the film. Irvine had the good grace
to be attractive so all wasn’t totally lost.
The setting of Eel Marsh
House is legitimately creepy and its dilapidated form gave the film ample opportunities
to create some good haunted house set pieces however we were reduced to a skeletal
CGI hand repeatedly poking through the floorboards and never ending shots of a
rocking chair. The rocking chair was a key feature in The Woman in Black however in Angel of Death it became repetitive very quickly.
The film attempted to
explore the origins of the Woman in Black but it was essentially a
rehash of information that I already knew and it didn’t bring her story to any conclusion. In this regards it was a wasted
opportunity. A third film, which already
feels inevitable, will undoubtedly cover the same ground with the only
difference being that it will be set in another time period. I can’t pretend that I won’t go and see it on
opening night *sigh*.
Despite its flaws I already know that The Woman in Black: Angel of Death will probably be one of the better horror films that I see in the cinema this year. This somehow makes it all the more disappointing. The Woman in Black: Angel of Death gets 5/10. It's worth a look in the cinema but it doesn't deserve any further thought once the lights go up. It's lather, rinse, repeat filmmaking at its laziest.
Even the Woman in Black can't stifle a yawn.
Meh, seems like just another unnecessary sequel. We'll get it in February. I'll report back! :)
ReplyDeleteI was excited by the sequel as I am a huge fan of The Woman in Black but it is a bit paint-by-numbers. There is nothing new or exciting at all which is a shame.
DeleteIt's worth a look but don't expect much - you don't have too long to wait!
K :-)
Even worse than paint-by-numbers or run-of-the-mill: unimaginative, boring and so packed with oh-so-scary jump scares, I really wanted to kill the director :D
DeleteI was expecting you to react like that! You are perfectly right to though. It was a real come down from the first film which I loved.
DeleteK :-)
I still haven't seen that first one, just never got around to it, but this one screamed unnecessary....
ReplyDeleteI love the first one, it is a really good jumpy horror and Daniel Radcliffe is surprisingly good in it. The second one was unnecessary but I didn't mind it because of my love for The Woman in Black. It wasn't worth it though, disappointing.
DeleteK :-(