Oscar Season is well underway but Lincoln was the film that I
cared about the least. It was only after
watching a few tv spots that I began to take an interest.
It has now got to the stage
that I don’t feel comfortable writing a review without issuing some sort of
disclaimer. It will come as a surprise
to no one that I have no idea how historically accurate Lincoln is and staying
true to myself I am not inclined to partake in any research before writing
this blog.
PLOT: During the Civil War Abraham Lincoln
(Daniel Day-Lewis) begins a campaign to pass the 13th Amendment and
abolish slavery. Lincoln’s team are in a
race against time to gain the votes to have the Amendment passed before the war
ends. END PLOT
I
have watched the first four seasons of The West Wing often enough to know that
political drama is not only exciting but also down right stressful. Lincoln was neither.
Despite all the political manoeuvring
there was no tension or sense of urgency and in a film that clocks in at a mammoth 150mins
(IMDB) this is not a good thing. By the
time the Amendment was passed I was more than ready for the film to be over.
The script glossed over the 13th
Amendment, the Democratic Party, the Civil War and
slavery to the extent that it was no deeper than – North/Lincoln = Good.
South/Democratic = Bad.
If Sorkin had written the script
both parties would have put forth eloquent arguments
before the Amendment was passed. There is no real political debate but there are numerous speeches – Tommy Lee Jones gets one and the rest involve
Lincoln sauntering into various rooms to monologue at whatever poor sod who happened
to be there.
The storytelling didn’t impress
me but I went to Lincoln to see if all the fuss over Daniel Day-Lewis’ performance was justified. There is no denying Daniel Day-Lewis' acting abilities and his performance as Abraham Lincoln was absolutely amazing.
The supporting cast of Tommy Lee
Jones, James Spader and Lee Pace are all very capable but Lincoln is
Daniel Day-Lewis’ film. Joseph Gordon-Levitt popped up in
a small and underdeveloped role as Lincoln’s son but the
scenes with Lincoln’s sons and wife (Sally Fields) added unnecessary length to
an already bloated running time.
The sets, costumes and
cinematography were all stunning but in Lincoln the most interesting
thing is always Daniel Day-Lewis.
Lincoln is too long, slow and at
times verges on boring but it is worth a look if only to watch
Daniel Day-Lewis. It gets a 6/10 but will never be watched again. I can't sum the film up any deeper than Daniel Day Lewis = Good. Lincoln = Bad.
wow, pretty mediocre rating! Looks like as long as there are no zombies or vampires, Lincoln just sucks ;-D
ReplyDeleteThere is no doubting Daniel Day-Lewis but overall the film was pretty (and surprisingly) boring.
DeleteI had aged a few decades by the time the opening credits rolled!
Out of the two I think I am more likely to watch Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter quicker
K :-)
Personally never found it boring but I love all the historical stuff, Day-Lewis is the center piece and he is always enjoyalbe.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Daniel, "Lincoln" never bored me. Great pacing, tremendous acting and outstanding costumes / set design.
DeleteThe sets/costumes and performances were amazing I was just very disappointed that the history wasn't dealt with in greater detail.
DeleteGlad you both enjoyed it but Lincoln just didn't work for me!
K :-)