I am not ashamed to admit that at twenty-eight years of age I still consider
myself to be growing up with Disney. I
know the characters, I know the songs and I have literally gone out and bought
the tee-shirts. The idea of retelling the
story of Sleeping Beauty from Maleficent’s point of view was intriguing and the
casting of Angelina Jolie seemed almost genius, but despite this, the trailer
arrived and I could not muster up any interest. I tried.
PLOT: A young Maleficent (Angelina Jolie) falls in
love with a lowly farm boy named Stefan (Sharlto Copley). Stefan’s ambitions get in the way and he
steals Maleficent’s wings so that he can be king. Maleficent gets her revenge by placing a curse
on his daughter Aurora (Elle Fanning). END PLOT
The
story is essentially the familiar tale of Sleeping Beauty with the roles
reversed. Maleficent becomes the
anti-hero and King Stefan becomes the inexplicably insane villain. It was always going to play out in this manner
but the script lacked the capability to make the story flow in anything other
than the most predictable and mundane way.
The
poor writing was most noticeable during the section in which Maleficent
lost her wings. Stefan drugging the wine
and cutting off Maleficent’s wings followed by Angelina Jolie’s screams when she awoke
created a very unsubtle, and frankly, uncomfortable comparison to date rape. There could be no other way for an adult to
watch this ill-conceived scene.
Angelina
Jolie is really the only person you could cast as the title character and she
can hold her head high. It’s been quite
a while since I’ve seen Jolie on screen and I forgot just how engaging she can
be. Elle
Fanning does nothing but break out the big smile as and when required but she
fares much better in the accent department than Sharlto Copley. I have heard Copley speak in many accents and
fail at most.
The
three fairies – Imelda Staunton, Lesley Manville and the always wonderful Juno
Temple were excellent and the most entertaining part of the film. This of course means that their screen time
was the most limited.
The
special effects were inline with the quality expected from a big budget film but were as uninspiring as the script. The Ents were a big moment in 2002 but shoehorning walking and talking trees into a fantasy film twelve years later is in no way an impressive achievement.
Disney appears to be following a formula of nabbing a headlining star then
throwing lots of colour and quirky creatures into a blender and mixing up a
distinctly average film that makes a billion at the Box Office. I am tipping my hat at Disney with one hand but
giving them the finger with the other.
I would of had more respect for the film if one of the greatest villains in history didn’t have an origin story which stems from her wings being stolen by a man. It cheapened an iconic character for a quick buck. It may be cynical but Frozen’s success was due to the fact that it struck a chord with the adult members of the audience not the children. Maleficent will do no such thing. It doesn’t deserve to.
Maleficent gets 3/10. I feel sorry for Angelina Jolie for giving her all in such an appalling film.
Oops, another dud. Loads of crap in cinema currently - but wait until you've seen Edge Of Tomorrow. I'm 100% sure this one will give you a friggin' great time :)
ReplyDeleteDud is a very kind way to put it!
DeleteTerrible film....... not sure about Edge of Tomorrow though, I am not Tom Cruises biggest fan!
K :-)
Trust me, you will like this. He dies more than a hundred times in the entire film - a must-see for Cruise-haters :D
DeleteJeez! How did I NOT know about this!!
DeleteI bet he lives in the end or dies a hero..... neither are acceptable. ;-)
Angelina Jolie has always kind of confused me, I just don't get her appeal, which has turned into general dislike. Needless to say I was skipping this movie and it sounds like it was a good choice.
ReplyDeleteSkip it and never look back!
DeleteIt offers nothing as a film - it doesn't even kill 90mins
K :-)