Showing posts with label Michael Pena. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Pena. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 July 2015

Ant-Man

 
The Marvel Money Train rumbles on and I’m not ashamed to admit that I have bought my first class ticket.  I'm enjoying the ride and although some films are bumpier than others I am with it until the bitter end or my metaphor completely derails.  Before Thor came out I couldn’t get my head around how the character would fit into the Marvel Universe and then it turned out to be one of my favourite films so regardless of how strange a concept is I will always give Marvel the benefit of the doubt. 
My problem with Ant-Man was never the concept.  It was always the casting.  A poor and over played trailer didn’t do anything to increase my enthusiasm. 
PLOT:  Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) has just been released from prison and is recruited by Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) to break into a building and steal the same shrinking technology because, erm, no one likes competition.  Scott Lang dons the Ant-Man suit and becomes the hero he was born to be.  END PLOT
The first Ant-Man film was always going to be an origin story and although nearly all the major players in The Avengers got one the concept is beginning to feel overdone.  The main plotline is nothing more than an elaborate heist to stop Cross (Corey Stall) from selling his legally manufactured weapon for profit in what is now a morally dubious action despite it being hero Tony Stark’s key source of income.  I think that Hank Pym secretly hates bald people.  The heist involved a band of crooks with the most memorable being Michael Pena who gave the film its biggest laughs.  Unfortunately, the overall criminal prowess of Lang’s gang was harder to buy into than the idea of a fully functioning ant army.
The effects were excellent and I thoroughly enjoyed the ant sized action sequences which were all great fun to watch.  There was plenty of humour scattered throughout the action and training montages but I found myself playing “Spot the Edgar Wright” sections of the script.  The family drama felt unnecessary although Hollywood’s resident wife and mother, Judy Greer is always a welcome addition to any film.
As mentioned above my main concern was the casting of Paul Rudd.  Rudd is the actor you cast as the lead man’s best friend who offers witty and slightly drunken advice in a bar and is at his best in very small doses.  The first time I saw the trailer I immediately thought that Joel McHale would have been better in the role and I carried this thought with me for months as my dislike of Rudd’s casting and the trailer grew.  The dry humour and sarcastic tone would have suited McHale perfectly but I did warm to Rudd in the role although I do not believe for one second that the dude is capable of jumping a garden fence unaided let alone scale a wall.  Rudd was passable and by the time the closing credits rolled around I had gotten over my irrational gripe.
Evangeline Lilly’s Hope van Dyne was a vital cog in Cross and Pyms’ plans despite doing nothing more strenuous than cross her arms and stare witheringly into space. 
Don't worry Evangeline................
 
The passing reference to her love of karate and then have her suddenly kick ass just made the whole independent woman vibe feel clichéd.  The closing credits scene didn’t surprise me at all but I am curious to see how that storyline develops. 
It'll soon be over............
Michael Douglas brought some sass to Hank Pym and played the cranky mentor very well; his discrimination against bald people aside.
The weakest link in the cast is Corey Stall.  Stall overacts like crazy and is saddled with a wafer-thin villain whose only crime is being a reasonably intelligent yet slightly dickish scientist.  In an attempt to make Cross a true villain he literally sends some lambs to the slaughter and grins manically from time to time.  This is his only character development.  It was a poor offering which was a million miles away from the charismatic Loki or the emotionally conflicted Winter Soldier. 
Thankfully Ant-Man was much better than expected and was a solid, if generic, introduction to a new Marvel character.  I am not against seeing more of Ant-Man in future films.  The references to The Avengers characters scattered throughout the film were appreciated and we got an idea of where Ant-Man is going to slot in to the upcoming Civil War arc.  Overall Ant-Man was a decent summer film and gets 7/10 and the second post credit sequence was Marvel’s best to date.  
Oops, you've just seen the post credits sequence haven't you?

Saturday, 12 January 2013

Gangster Squad




2011 was the year of Ryan Gosling. It was the year that everyone was introduced to an actor that they already knew but hadn't realized the badass potential.

2012 was sadly very Gosling light but luckily the movie gods had the good sense to release Gangster Squad in January 2013.

The trailer was enough to convince me but I was very aware that negative reviews were starting to filter through.

PLOT:  Detective John O’Mara (Josh Brolin) is assigned to bring down notorious mob boss Mickey Cohen (Sean Penn).  O’Mara and his team - Jerry (Ryan Goslin), Harris (Anthony Mackie), Keeler (Giovanni Ribisi), Navidad (Michael Peña) and Kennard (Robert Patrick) turn in their badges and begin a vigilante campaign against Cohen.  END PLOT

There is nothing new about Gangster Squad.  The undercover team learning to work together to bring down the bad buy is not original.  Gangster Squad attempts to rely on a stylish 1940’s backdrop to disguise the familiarity but fails to pull it off and behind the Hollywood gloss lies a paint by numbers script.

Generic plotting can usually be forgiven by decent casting and thankfully, for the most, part Gangster Squad got this spot on.

Josh Brolin is excellent as the straight laced O’Mara and bounces off the carefree Gosling very well.  The supporting members of the team – Ribisi, Patrick and Peña are just as strong.  I have always been a fan of Anthony Mackie but the amount of joy that arose from his appearance surprised me and as per usual he is brilliant but underused.

Emma Stone (although stunning) is hampered by an underwritten, and at times forgotten about, sub-love-plot with Gosling.  They do not recapture their chemistry from Crazy, Stupid, Love but this is due to no fault of their own.

The weak link is Sean Penn - he is charisma free and permanently angry so essentially he is playing himself in a 1940’s suit.

The main problem with Gangster Squad is the tone.  When the detectives are working together the film has some comedic moments however when we are “treated” to more Penn the film stutters and becomes very serious.  Overall the tone is disjointed which  means that Gangster Squad isn't sure what type of film it really wants to be.  

In an empty cinema booing Penn and cheering Gosling’s casual charm meant that Gangster Squad was enjoyed much more than it deserved to be – it gets 7/10.  It is sleek and has no substance but it is just about saved by the performances of Brolin and his detectives.