Showing posts with label Viola Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viola Davis. Show all posts

Sunday, 29 September 2013

Prisoners

 
When the trailer for Prisoners appeared it looked like a solid thriller.  The Oscar buzz which followed took me by surprise as there was nothing from the trailer to indicate that they would be making a run for gold.
I was always going to see Prisoners but the unexpected cries of brilliance from the cinema going public did pique my interest.
PLOT:  Following a Thanksgiving meal Anna Dover (Erin Gerasimovich) and Joy Birch (Kyla Drew Simmons) go missing and the only clue to their whereabouts is an old R.V driven by Alex Jones, (Paul Dano) a mentally impaired young man.  Anna’s father Keller (Hugh Jackman) loses patience with the investigation conducted by Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) and takes matters into his own hands in an attempt to find his daughter.  END PLOT
A film that focuses on missing children should always be a tense affair however Prisoners only manages this in short bursts.  The early scenes between Dover and Jones are genuinely nail-biting however they quickly peter out and leave us with a hanging plot thread that no one really knows what to do with.  It is thereafter ignored completely.
Prisoners lasts for 2hours 33mins (IMDB) and although the film doesn’t feel slow the long running time does it no favours whatsoever.  I figured out the whereabouts of the children very early on in the film.  This made the investigation into the girls’ disappearance drag and I ended up watching Prisoners feeling more impatient that tense.
It did not help that the film resorted to glaringly obvious clichés such as “conveniently timed phone call” or the “desk tantrum that throws up a vital clue” to move the story along.
As I had figured out the culprit long before the characters it meant that I couldn’t get on-board with their actions.  Detective Loki is probably the most incompetent police officer in history and Keller Dover’s actions became unnecessarily overdramatic.
There was no emotional engagement with Keller Dover as his actions were simply wrong.  The film tries to raise the question – what would you be capable of doing to save your daughter – but it doesn’t do this well.  Instead of seeing a grieving father desperate to find his child we see an obsessive man torturing a mentally disabled boy for a period of five days.
Viola Davis (Nancy Birch) and Terence Howard (Franklin Birch) fare much better in this regard.  The Birches inner conflict and doubt has a much greater effect than Jackman’s emotional bullying tactics to encourage their involvement.
I will only acknowledge Maria Bello to say that I actively dislike her in all her endeavours.
Jake Gyllenhaal is as dependable as ever although Detective Loki is underwritten to the extent that his first name is Detective.  Loki’s backstory is nothing more than a throwaway line about growing up in an orphanage with dodgy priests.  It is probably a good thing that this little tit-bit of information was not explored as it would create a whole other movie.  The constant blinking was incredibly distracting as it took me a while to realise that this was a character trait and not Gyllenhaal having the onset of glaucoma.
Paul Dano, Melisa Leo and David Dastmalchian all provide very capable support to an already stellar cast.
The performances can’t really be faulted.  Jackman is as good as he has ever been and deserves the hype surrounding his performance.  Prisoners is a good reminder that Jackman can and should be more than Wolverine.
If Jackman, Davis and Howard get award nominations they will be deserved as the cast carry the film.  In lesser hands Prisoners would have passed by unnoticed and it would have been no great loss to cinema.
Prisoners is a decent film.  The film looks good and the cast are excellent but it is grossly overhyped.  Prisoners gets 7/10.  It will be watched again if I can pick it up cheap on DVD but other than that Prisoners killed an afternoon in the cinema and nothing more.

Sunday, 17 February 2013

Beautiful Creatures

 
I am not a huge fan of teen franchises.  The train to Hogwarts had already left the station several years before I showed up to catch it and the notion of sparkling vampires both terrifies and amuses me. 
If it wasn’t for a decent trailer Beautiful Creatures would have passed me by.  I don’t care that I haven't read the book.
PLOT:  After Ethan (Alden Ehrenreich) falls for Lena, (Alice Englert) the new girl at school he discovers that she is a “caster” and on her approaching sixteenth birthday she will be claimed to either serve the dark or light for all eternity. Will the star crossed lovers live happily ever after and more importantly will I give a shit by the closing credits?  END PLOT
Forbidden love, family secrets, supernatural powers and homework – Beautiful Creatures has all of the key attributes expected from a teen fiction adaptation.  The plot isn’t ground breaking but the history of casters is given a local feel within the town of Gatlin which gives the mythology more depth than expected.
With a running time of just over two hours Beautiful Creatures takes its time getting to final showdown but unfortunately it couldn't build up any real tension.  The finale was essentially two women standing in a field shouting at each other on a blustery afternoon.
Beautiful Creatures does attempt to be different by telling the story from Ethan’s point of view rather than Lenas.  This works out very well thanks to the ridiculously charming performance of Alden Ehrenreich 
Ehrenreich and Englert have decent chemistry and with support provided by Viola Davis, Emma Thompson and Jeremy Irons the quality of the acting is very fine indeed.  Thompson is clearly enjoying herself which is always fun to watch.
There are a couple of set pieces but they don’t rate above average.  The effects, such as spinning tables, shattering glass and angry lightening have all been done before.  The smaller moments, such as the writing appearing on the walls and books, were handled much better.
I feel sorry for Beautiful Creatures as it will constantly be compared to Twilight.  The comparisons are to be expected but are completely unfounded as the actors in Beautiful Creatures are not charmless droids devoid of any personality – it is the actors who save this film.
Beautiful Creatures is certainly not in the running for the best film of the year and for those who have no interest in reading the books I would probably advise you to stay away.  It wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be is the strongest compliment I can give.
Watchable. Enjoyable. Forgettable.  Beautiful Creatures gets 5.5/10